Comparing Imperative and Declarative Process Models

Titelangaben

Baumann, Michaela:
Comparing Imperative and Declarative Process Models.
Bayreuth , 2017 . - 12 S.

Volltext

	Format: PDF Name: MBaumann_ComparingProcessModels_DeHMiMoP17_EPub.pdf Version: Preprint Verfügbar mit der Lizenz Deutsches Urheberrechtsgesetz. Das Dokument darf zum eigenen Gebrauch kostenfrei genutzt werden. Darüber hinaus bedürfen die Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und jede Art der Verwertung der schriftlichen Zustimmung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers.
	Download (309kB)

Abstract

The field of process model similarity matching is well examined for imperative process models like BPMN models, Petri nets, or EPCs where a lot of different measuring techniques exist. For the recently upcoming declarative process models, generally providing more flexibility than imperative models, however, there is a lack of comparison methods. Along with their advantage of providing more flexibility, declarative process models have a disadvantage in comprehending the models, especially the models' behavior. To overcome this problem, a comparison of imperative and declarative models is reasonable to check whether the declarative model represents a desired behavior which is easier to express and validate in an imperative notation. The work at hand provides a method based on flow dependencies, abstracting from the modeling type, for comparing two process models. It uses not only information about control-flow, but also data-based dependencies between process activities.