Publications by the same author
plus in the repository
plus in Google Scholar

Bibliografische Daten exportieren
 

A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic Disparities in Outcomes of Digital Interventions for Weight-Related Behaviors

DOI zum Zitieren der Version auf EPub Bayreuth: https://doi.org/10.15495/EPub_UBT_00008979
URN to cite this document: urn:nbn:de:bvb:703-epub-8979-8

Title data

Mercer, Lee C. ; Al Masri, Mirna ; Rocha, Diana ; König, Laura M. ; Western, Max:
A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic Disparities in Outcomes of Digital Interventions for Weight-Related Behaviors.
In: Obesity Reviews. (2026) . - e70121.
ISSN 1467-789X
DOI der Verlagsversion: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70121

[thumbnail of Obesity Reviews_2026_Mercer_A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic.pdf]
Format: PDF
Name: Obesity Reviews_2026_Mercer_A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic.pdf
Version: Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons BY 4.0: Attribution
Download (1MB)

Abstract

Digital behavioral change interventions (DBCIs) for weight-related behaviors may be less effective in disadvantaged populations, potentially widening health inequalities despite increased access. Limited research has explored the psychosocial mechanisms that may contribute to this divide. Following JBI guidelines for conducting scoping reviews, we conducted an electronic search on Embase, PubMed, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science, and SCOPUS on March 8, 2023, including studies published since 1990. The mechanisms of action ontology was used for deductive coding of the mechanisms discussed. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (https:// osf. io/ ctua5 ). After initial screening of 17,503 papers, 21 studies met inclusion criteria, including RCTs, pre-post studies, systematic reviews, qualitative studies, cross-sectional, pilot, and feasibility studies. A second screen of 7840 articles in June 2025 identified three further studies that met the inclusion criteria. Socioeconomic inequalities and ethnicity were the predominant focus. Environment, motivation, and social influences were frequently cited mechanisms. However, mechanisms are inconsistently conceptualized and measured, highlighting a gap in explanatory research on the digital health divide.

Further data

Item Type: Article in a journal
Keywords: digital divide; digital health; health inequalities; socioeconomic status
DDC Subjects: 600 Technology, medicine, applied sciences > 610 Medicine and health
Institutions of the University: Faculties > Faculty of Law, Business and Economics > Chair Planetary and Public Health
Faculties > Faculty of Law, Business and Economics > Chair Planetary and Public Health > Chair Planetary and Public Health - Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Wilm Quentin
Faculties
Faculties > Faculty of Law, Business and Economics
Language: English
Originates at UBT: Yes
URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:703-epub-8979-8
Date Deposited: 13 Mar 2026 12:24
Last Modified: 13 Mar 2026 12:24
URI: https://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/8979

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year