Suche nach Personen

plus im Publikationsserver
plus bei Google Scholar

Bibliografische Daten exportieren
 

A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic Disparities in Outcomes of Digital Interventions for Weight-Related Behaviors

DOI zum Zitieren der Version auf EPub Bayreuth: https://doi.org/10.15495/EPub_UBT_00008979
URN zum Zitieren der Version auf EPub Bayreuth: urn:nbn:de:bvb:703-epub-8979-8

Titelangaben

Mercer, Lee C. ; Al Masri, Mirna ; Rocha, Diana ; König, Laura M. ; Western, Max:
A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic Disparities in Outcomes of Digital Interventions for Weight-Related Behaviors.
In: Obesity Reviews. (2026) . - e70121.
ISSN 1467-789X
DOI der Verlagsversion: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70121

Volltext

[thumbnail of Obesity Reviews_2026_Mercer_A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic.pdf]
Format: PDF
Name: Obesity Reviews_2026_Mercer_A Scoping Review of the Mechanisms Influencing Socioeconomic.pdf
Version: Veröffentlichte Version
Verfügbar mit der Lizenz Creative Commons BY 4.0: Namensnennung
Download (1MB)

Abstract

Digital behavioral change interventions (DBCIs) for weight-related behaviors may be less effective in disadvantaged populations, potentially widening health inequalities despite increased access. Limited research has explored the psychosocial mechanisms that may contribute to this divide. Following JBI guidelines for conducting scoping reviews, we conducted an electronic search on Embase, PubMed, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science, and SCOPUS on March 8, 2023, including studies published since 1990. The mechanisms of action ontology was used for deductive coding of the mechanisms discussed. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (https:// osf. io/ ctua5 ). After initial screening of 17,503 papers, 21 studies met inclusion criteria, including RCTs, pre-post studies, systematic reviews, qualitative studies, cross-sectional, pilot, and feasibility studies. A second screen of 7840 articles in June 2025 identified three further studies that met the inclusion criteria. Socioeconomic inequalities and ethnicity were the predominant focus. Environment, motivation, and social influences were frequently cited mechanisms. However, mechanisms are inconsistently conceptualized and measured, highlighting a gap in explanatory research on the digital health divide.

Weitere Angaben

Publikationsform: Artikel in einer Zeitschrift
Keywords: digital divide; digital health; health inequalities; socioeconomic status
Themengebiete aus DDC: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Institutionen der Universität: Fakultäten > Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät > Lehrstuhl Planetary and Public Health
Fakultäten > Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät > Lehrstuhl Planetary and Public Health > Lehrstuhl Planetary and Public Health - Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Wilm Quentin
Fakultäten
Fakultäten > Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
Sprache: Englisch
Titel an der UBT entstanden: Ja
URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:703-epub-8979-8
Eingestellt am: 13 Mrz 2026 12:24
Letzte Änderung: 13 Mrz 2026 12:24
URI: https://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/8979

Downloads

Downloads pro Monat im letzten Jahr