Social connections and ethical entrapments : On doing anthropology of and through the border regime

Titelangaben

Castellano, Viola:
Social connections and ethical entrapments : On doing anthropology of and through the border regime.
In: Anthropological Theory. Bd. 25 (2025) Heft 1 . - S. 78-96.
ISSN 1741-2641
DOI der Verlagsversion: https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996241247432

Volltext

	Format: PDF Name: castellano-2024-social-connections-and-ethical-entrapments-on-doing-anthropology-of-and-through-the-border-regime.pdf Version: Veröffentlichte Version Verfügbar mit der Lizenz Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0: Namensnennung, nicht kommerziell
	Download (316kB)

Abstract

The article aims to conceptualize the relational dimension of the border regime and its function in reinforcing and reproducing global inequalities. It does so by analyzing the social connections that shaped my fieldwork on The Gambia's “backway,” the illegalized trip to Europe. In particular, the article focuses on what I define as moments of ethical entrapment that my main Gambian interlocutor and I faced while interacting with people in Serekunda. In interrogating those entrapments as simultaneously provoked by and exposing the border regime, the analysis highlights how borderwork and the potentiality of border violence constantly haunt social connections at/in/across borders. At the same time, the article looks at the emergence of such entrapments as a product of the shifting and ambiguous positionalities subjects hold in the different nodes of borders’ temporally and spatially scattered assemblages. I argue that the analysis of such social connections and ethical entrapments discloses the implications of doing anthropology of the border regime through the border regime itself. On the one hand, borders’ capacity to act on and through subjects—even beyond their conscious will—reinforce the principle of dissimilarity on which they rely and reproduce. On the other hand, the ethical entrapments emerging from the connections that the border regime creates between people illuminate its socially productive, counterintuitive, and fragmented dimensions, potentially opening space for what Povinelli defined as the otherwise.