Data for health system comparison and assessment in the African Region: A review of 63 indicators available in international databases

Titelangaben

Polin, Katherine ; Shuftan, Nathan ; Webb, Erin ; Opoku, Daniel ; Droti, Benson ; Quentin, Wilm:
Data for health system comparison and assessment in the African Region: A review of 63 indicators available in international databases.
In: Journal of Global Health. Bd. 14 (2024) . - 04118.
ISSN 2047-2986
DOI der Verlagsversion: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04118

Volltext

	Format: PDF Name: Polin_et_al_2024_health_sysems_data_Africa.pdf Version: Veröffentlichte Version Verfügbar mit der Lizenz Creative Commons BY 4.0: Namensnennung
	Download (1MB)

Abstract

Background Achieving universal health coverage in the African region requires health systems strengthening. Assessing and comparing health systems contributes to this process, but requires internationally comparable data. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies has produced Health Systems in Transition (HiT) reviews in Europe, Asia, North America and the Caribbean with a standardised template. This study explores data availability in international databases for the quantitative health and health system indicators in the HiT template for the WHO African region. Methods We identified ten databases which contained data for 40 of the 80 original HiT indicators and an additional 23 proxy indicators to fill some gaps. We then assessed data availability for the resulting 63 indicators by country and time, i.e. first/last year of data, years of data available overall and since 2000, and we explored for each indicator (1) against the country with the greatest availability overall and (2) against annual availability for all years since 2000. Results Overall data availability was greatest in South Africa (93.0% of possible total points) and least in South Sudan (59.5%). Since 2000, Uganda (60.4%) has had the highest data availability and South Sudan (37.2%) the lowest. By topic, data availability was the highest for health financing (91.4%; median start/end date 2000/2019) and background characteristics (88.5%; 1990/2020) and was considerably lower for health system performance (54.5%; 2000/2018) and physical and human resources (4.8%; 2004/2013). Data are available for different years in different countries, and at irregular intervals, complicating time series analysis. No data are available for service provision indicators. Conclusions Gaps in data in international databases across time, countries, and topics undermine systematic health systems comparisons and assessments, regional health systems strengthening, and efforts to achieve universal health coverage. More efforts are needed to strengthen national data collection and management and integrate national data into international databases to support cross-country assessments, peer learning, and planning. In tandem, more research is needed to understand the specific historical, cultural, administrative, and technological determinants influencing country data availability, as well as the facilitators and barriers of data sharing between countries and international databases, and the potential of new technologies to increase timeliness of data.