Publications by the same author
plus in the repository
plus in Google Scholar

Bibliografische Daten exportieren
 

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Risky Health Interventions : Moving Beyond Risk Neutrality

DOI zum Zitieren der Version auf EPub Bayreuth: https://doi.org/10.15495/EPub_UBT_00008664
URN to cite this document: urn:nbn:de:bvb:703-epub-8664-9

Title data

Thoma, Johanna:
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Risky Health Interventions : Moving Beyond Risk Neutrality.
In: Ratio. Vol. 38 (2025) Issue 4 . - pp. 219-227.
ISSN 1467-9329
DOI der Verlagsversion: https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12431

[thumbnail of Ratio - 2024 - Thoma - Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Risky Health Interventions Moving Beyond Risk Neutrality.pdf]
Format: PDF
Name: Ratio - 2024 - Thoma - Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Risky Health Interventions Moving Beyond Risk Neutrality.pdf
Version: Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons BY 4.0: Attribution
Download (217kB)

Project information

Project title:
Project's official title
Project's id
Open Access Publizieren
No information

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis for health interventions is traditionally conducted in a risk-neutral way, insensitive to risk attitudes in the population, which are potentially non-neutral. While the standard outcome metric of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) aims to be deferential to people's valuations of health states, cost-effectiveness analysis of risky interventions using the QALY metric is not similarly deferential to people's risk attitudes. I argue that there is no good justification for this practice. Non-neutral attitudes to risk, especially where they concern individually life-changing interventions need not be irrational, and so imposing neutrality is not justifiable as a way of debiasing preferences. Many common justifications for deference to health state preferences extend to risk attitudes. But even if reasons for deference do not extend, imposition of risk neutrality as opposed to any other rationally permissible risk attitude is under-motivated as default practice. Thus, either methods for measuring risk attitudes separately and incorporating them into cost-effectiveness analysis should be used more widely or a richer set of information should be presented to political decision-makers and the public to enable them to decide how to take into account the individual risks faced by members of the population, on top of aggregate effects on population health.

Further data

Item Type: Article in a journal
Keywords: cost-effectiveness analysis; health economics; paternalism; public policy; risk
DDC Subjects: 100 Philosophy and psychology > 100 Philosophy
Institutions of the University: Faculties > Faculty of Cultural Studies > Department of Philosophy > Chair Ethics > Chair Ethics - Univ.-Prof. Dr. Johanna Thoma
Faculties
Faculties > Faculty of Cultural Studies
Faculties > Faculty of Cultural Studies > Department of Philosophy
Faculties > Faculty of Cultural Studies > Department of Philosophy > Chair Ethics
Language: English
Originates at UBT: Yes
URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:703-epub-8664-9
Date Deposited: 11 Nov 2025 09:59
Last Modified: 12 Nov 2025 07:12
URI: https://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/8664

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year