URN to cite this document: urn:nbn:de:bvb:703-epub-7891-9
Title data
Waitzberg, Ruth ; Pfundstein, Isabel ; Maresso, Anna ; Rechel, Bernd ; van Ginneken, Ewout ; Quentin, Wilm:
Health system description and assessment: a scoping review of templates for systematic analyses.
In: Health Research Policy and Systems.
Vol. 22
(2024)
.
- 82.
ISSN 1478-4505
DOI der Verlagsversion: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01166-y
|
|||||||||
Download (1MB)
|
Abstract
Understanding and comparing health systems is key for cross-country learning and health system strengthening. Templates help to develop standardised and coherent descriptions and assessments of health systems, which then allow meaningful analyses and comparisons. Our scoping review aims to provide an overview of existing templates, their content and the way data is presented. Main body Based on the WHO building blocks framework, we defined templates as having (1) an overall framework, (2) a list of indicators or topics, and (3) instructions for authors, while covering (4) the design of the health system, (5) an assessment of health system performance, and (6) should cover the entire health system. We conducted a scoping review of grey literature published between 2000 and 2023 to identify templates. The content of the identified templates was screened, analyzed and compared. We found 12 documents that met our inclusion criteria. The building block `health financing´ is covered in all 12 templates; and many templates cover ´service delivery´ and ´health workforce’. Health system performance is frequently assessed with regard to ‘access and coverage’, ‘quality and safety’, and ‘financial protection’. Most templates do not cover ‘responsiveness’ and ‘efficiency’. Seven templates combine quantitative and qualitative data, three are mostly quantitative, and two are primarily qualitative. Templates cover data and information that is mostly relevant for specific groups of countries, e.g. a particular geographical region, or for high or for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Templates for LMICs rely more on survey-based indicators than administrative data. Conclusions This is the first scoping review of templates for standardized descriptions of health systems and assessments of their performance. The implications are that (1) templates can help analyze health systems across countries while accounting for context; (2) template-guided analyses of health systems could underpin national health policies, strategies, and plans; (3) organizations developing templates could learn from approaches of other templates; and (4) more research is needed on how to improve templates to better achieve their goals. Our findings provide an overview and help identify the most important aspects and topics to look at when comparing and analyzing health systems, and how data are commonly presented. The templates were created by organizations with different agendas and target audiences, and with different end products in mind. Comprehensive health systems analyses and comparisons require production of quantitative indicators and complementing them with qualitative information to build a holistic picture.
Further data
Item Type: | Article in a journal |
---|---|
Keywords: | Health policy; Health system design; Scoping review; Template |
DDC Subjects: | 600 Technology, medicine, applied sciences > 610 Medicine and health |
Institutions of the University: | Faculties > Faculty of Law, Business and Economics > Chair Planetary and Public Health > Chair Planetary and Public Health - Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Wilm Quentin Faculties Faculties > Faculty of Law, Business and Economics Faculties > Faculty of Law, Business and Economics > Chair Planetary and Public Health |
Language: | English |
Originates at UBT: | Yes |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:703-epub-7891-9 |
Date Deposited: | 17 Sep 2024 12:35 |
Last Modified: | 17 Sep 2024 12:35 |
URI: | https://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/7891 |